Question: Krishnamurti says that one craves sex, because in that, one finds no ‘me’, ego, and hence no conflict. And one uses it as an escape. Why does one not use, meditation too, as an escape? Is it because that one lacks understanding, energy, or is it because that the outside influences and inherent tendencies, acquired and hence biological, are too strong?
“Love is a state in which there is no ‘me’;
love is a state in which there is no condemnation, no saying that sex is right or wrong, that this good and something else is bad. Love is none of these contradictory things. Contradiction does not exist in love.” ~J.Krishnamurti
Does this call for an inner strength stronger than the outer influences? How would one describe this inner strength in words, if it exists?
Acharya Prashant Ji: The basis of the question is, that one probably does not use meditation as an escape. But one does use meditation as an escape. One uses everything, as an escape.
One uses meditation, in precisely the same way, as one uses sex, or any other means of getting away.
Of course, Krishnamurti is spot on, when he says that, in the experience of sex, there is no ‘me’, no ego, and hence no conflict. So, there is a great peace, a silence, a touch of the beyond.
That peace, that silence, that touch of the beyond, is one’s ultimate desire.
But, is one ready to go beyond the touch? The ego is so afraid, and so stupid, that it is terrified of the one, it loves. That it wants to run away, from the same healing touch, it so craves for.
One will have ‘a little’ of it, one does not want ‘the whole’ of it. A little of it, ensures continuity of the ego. A little of it implies that one could have the healing touch, and yet remain what one is, yet continue with one’s ways. That much, is acceptable to the ego. But only that much, not beyond that.
The ego says, “My first priority, is to remain, exist, and after that comes everything else. Even the Truth must be subservient to my first priority.”…